Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Full Professor in Linguistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

2 PhD Candidate in Cognitive Linguistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

In light of the critical role of recall in daily life, this study explored two key factors affecting recall: emotional valence (positive, negative, or neutral emotions) and the figure-ground phenomenon, where one element is more prominent (figure) and the other recedes into the background (ground). Using eye-tracking technology, the study examined whether the figure-ground phenomenon applies to word recall, whether emotional valence or word placement has a stronger effect, whether fixation duration correlates with recall, and whether gender influences recall performance. This study involved 30 participants (men and women) and used a quasi-experimental design. Data analysis was conducted with SPSS (version 26). The results showed that word placement as a “figure” alone did not significantly impact recall (p>0.05). However, words with strong negative emotional valence were more frequently recalled—even when placed as “ground”—compared to neutral words in the “figure” position. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.01), indicating that negative emotional valence has a stronger influence on recall than word placement. Neutral words in the “figure” position were more likely to be recalled than emotionally valenced words (positive or negative) in the “ground” position (p<0.05). There was no significant correlation between fixation duration and word recall. Additionally, men and women showed no significant differences in recalling the first word, with both groups favoring words with strong negative emotional valence. However, men more often recalled neutral words in the “figure” position, while women more frequently recalled positively valenced words in the “ground” position as the second word.

Keywords

Main Subjects

استرنبرگ، ر. ج.، و استرنبرگ، ک. (1۳۹۶). روان‌شناسی شناختی (س. ک. خرازی و ا. حجازی، مترجمان). سمت.
حقیقی، ف.، و زارع، ح. (۱۳۹۲). اثر بسامد (حس آشنایی) تکلیف و انتظار آزمون در فراخوانی و بازشناسی واژگان. فصلنامه علمی پژوهش در یادگیری آموزشگاهی و مجازی، ۱(۱)، ۵۸–۷۳.
زارع، ح.، و صالح‌میرحسینی، و. (۱۳۹۱). بررسی اثر مداخله‌ای تصویرسازی ذهنی تعاملی و بار هیجانی کلمات بر یادآوری و بازشناس.  روانشناسی تربیتی، ۸(۲۵)، ۱۳۷–۱۵۳.
ضیایی، ا.، استاجی، ع.، و کامیابی‌گل، ع. (۱۴۰۲). بررسی تأثیر آموزش آگاهی واجی بر عملکرد حیطه مفاهیم ریاضی دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه دوم دبستان. زبانشناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، ۱۵(۴)، ۷۵–۱۰۵.
محمودعلیلو، م.، طهماسب‌پور، م.، و یاقوتی آذری، ش. (۱۳۹۷). حافظه بازشناسی و یادآوری در بیماران وسواسی جبری. مجله پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز، ۴۰(۲)، ۷۲–۷۸.
ملکیان، س.، عادل، س. م.، داودی، م.، و غنی‌آبادی، س. (۱۴۰۳). زبان و مراقبت: بررسی کیفی ادراکی زبان‌آموزان ایرانی بر اساس نظریه مراقبت نادینگز و لوگ‌استروپ. زبانشناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، ۱۶(۳)، ۴۷–۷۱.
یزدانی، س.، شریفی، ش.، فروغی‌پور، م.، و کامیابی‌گل، ع. (۱۳۹۸). مؤلفۀ بینایی-فضایی حافظۀ رویدادی در بیماران مبتلا به ام‌.اس. فارسی‌زبان. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مازندران، ۱۷۴، ۸۲–۹۵.
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved January 18, 2025, from https://dictionary.apa.org/
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words [ANEW]: Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings [Corpus, Rating Study No. C-1]. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
Craik, K. J. W., & Zangwill, O. L. (1939). Observations relating to the threshold of a small figure within the contour of a closed-line figure. British Journal of Psychology, 30(2), 139–150.
Davis, J. M. (1985). An examination of the status of the ground in figure–ground perception (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University.
Evans, V. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 10–14.
Kazui, H., Mori, E., & Hashimoto, M. (2000). Impact of emotion on memory. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 343–347.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.177.4.343
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Effect of negative emotional content on working memory and long-term memory. Emotion, 3(4), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.378 
Kensinger, E. A., Garoff-Eaton, R. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Effects of emotion on memory specificity in young and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62(3), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.4.p208
Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446
Kret, M. E., & De Gelder, B. (2012). A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1211–1221.
Nelson, R. A., & Palmer, S. E. (2007). Familiar shapes attract attention in figure-ground displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(3), 382–392.
Rubin, E. (1958). Figure and ground. In D. C. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 194–203). Van Nostrand. (Original work published in 1915).
Saylik, R., Szameitat, A. J., & Raman, E. (2018). Sex differences in emotion recognition and working memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1072.
Vazard, J. (2022). Feeling the unknown: Emotions of uncertainty and their valence. Erkenntnis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00583-1
Vecera, S. P., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1998). Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: An interactive account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.441
CAPTCHA Image