Dialectology
Sohrab Gholami; Jalal Rahimian; Farrokh Hajiyani
Abstract
Hanashur is one of the villages in Tasuj Rural District, Shonbeh and Tasuj District is in Dashti County, Bushehr Province. The Hanashuri dialect is a Persian language variety in Bushehr Province. Interviews with native speakers, recording their speech and phonetics, have been used to complete the linguistic ...
Read More
Hanashur is one of the villages in Tasuj Rural District, Shonbeh and Tasuj District is in Dashti County, Bushehr Province. The Hanashuri dialect is a Persian language variety in Bushehr Province. Interviews with native speakers, recording their speech and phonetics, have been used to complete the linguistic corpus of the research with field and descriptive-analytical methods with library tools to conduct this research, and the necessary information has been collected, reviewed, and analyzed using these methods. In this research, the analysis of the verb system and the understanding of the characteristics of its constituent components, the conjugation of verbs in the present aspect, mood, and tenses in Hanashuri have been considered. The results of the research show that the verb forms are from the past or non-past root and, like standard Persian, are classified in terms of type into auxiliary, lexical, and impersonal. The verb conjugation is in the past and non-past tense. The future tense does not exist in standard Persian, and the same present indicative is used for it, and the distinction between the two is made according to the context. All aspects of the indicative and non- indicative Finite and Non-finite verbs and the aspects of standard Persian are also seen in Hanashuri. Unlike most dialects of Dashti, the ergative feature is not seen in the Hanashuri dialect.
Parisa Najafi; Jalal Rahimian; Alireza Khormaee; Amirsaeid Moloodi
Abstract
Phase predicates describe each of the beginning, continuation, or end phases of an event and are expressed in the form of verbs such as start, continue, end, and so on. In this regard, we call the structures in which there is a phasal predicates "phase construction" and discuss them. We believe that ...
Read More
Phase predicates describe each of the beginning, continuation, or end phases of an event and are expressed in the form of verbs such as start, continue, end, and so on. In this regard, we call the structures in which there is a phasal predicates "phase construction" and discuss them. We believe that Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) with its approach to the analysis of complex constructions can be used as a theoretical framework for the present study. Based on this, we first analyze the syntactic and semantics aspects of phase constructions, then explain the interaction of the two levels of syntax and semantics. Finally, we will present the “constructional scheme” of phase constructions in Persian language. In the syntactic dimension, various types of "juncture-nexus" relations are considered, and in the semantics dimension, various properties of predicates will be the focus of discussion. Syntactic-semantic interaction in phase constructions will also be justified in the form of linking algorithms. It is worth mentioning that the data of the present study are taken from the corpus of Hamshahri 2.
Discourse analysis
Somaye Shokati Moqarab; Jalal Rahimian
Abstract
This study is about to find how conceptual metaphors help in drawing identity borders and attaining legitimacy. So, the semantic system of conceptual metaphor (Kováces, 2010) and the components of myth and social imagination (derived from Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory, 2001) make ...
Read More
This study is about to find how conceptual metaphors help in drawing identity borders and attaining legitimacy. So, the semantic system of conceptual metaphor (Kováces, 2010) and the components of myth and social imagination (derived from Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory, 2001) make the theoretical framework of the research to find how the semantic system affect reaching general legitimation. To answer the research question, Joe Biden’s speech in his inaugural ceremony in 20 Jan. 2021 is used as the case study. Based on the findings, metaphor provides a cognitive framework for expressing ideological ideas. Each metaphor in this discourse foregrounds a concept and backgrounds the alternative ones. The president conceptualizes the USA as “America is human” metaphor to accompany the nation, and avoid the party-based views. As a result, metaphor is a tool for avoiding clear border-makings, foregrounding concepts, and representing different views according to conceptual domains. Though using metaphor, discourses can turn to a discourse having the least out groups and the most in groups in a country. Therefore, conceptual metaphor provides a base for creating an ideal space for myth-making. Through such tools, Biden tried to capture a discourse trying to attract the attention of the most and avoid rejecting the potential groups.
