Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects

Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects

The Dominance of “Moving-Time” Model in the Metaphorical Perception of Time: A Cognitive-Linguistic Study in Sarhaddi Balochi Dialect

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Amirali Khoshkhounejad 1
Abbas Ali Ahangar 2
1 Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
10.22067/jlkd.2025.96461.1357
Abstract
The metaphorical conceptualization of time constitutes a pivotal domain in cognitive linguistics, illustrating how humans construct abstract concepts through concrete spatial experiences. According to Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980), two primary patterns (Moving-Ego and Moving-Time) have been identified for representing temporal concepts. Drawing upon the classic “Next Wednesday’s Meeting” paradigm (McGlone & Harding, 1998), this study investigated the metaphorical understanding of time in the Sarhadi Balochi dialect. The statistical population comprised 121 native speakers of Sarhadi Balochi (students at the University of Sistan and Baluchestan). Data were analyzed using the chi-square (χ²) test in SPSS software. Findings revealed that in a neutral context, the moving-time pattern is significantly dominant (p<0.001), indicating speakers’ tendency to conceptualize themselves as stationary entities toward whom events move as dynamic agents. Furthermore, results demonstrated that contextual priming (via contextualizing sentences) exerts a significant influence on the interpretation of the ambiguous phrase “Next Wednesday’s Meeting” (p<0.001), thereby supporting the dynamic nature of linguistic cognition. In contrast, gender showed no significant effect on temporal metaphor comprehension (p=0.36). These findings suggest that the tribal social structure and the cultural emphasis on historical traditions in Sarhadi Balochi society may play a decisive role in shaping this cognitive pattern.
Keywords
Time
Metaphor
Moving-Ego
Moving-Time
Sarhadi Balochi
Cognitive Linguistics
Subjects
خوشخونژاد، ا.ع. (1398). بررسی مقایسه‌ای برخی عوامل مؤثر بر تعبیر استعاری زمان در فارسی و بلوچی سرحدی: رویکردی شناختی (پایان نامه منتشرنشده دکتری). دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان.
سربازی، ا. (1381). موسیقی بلوچ برخاسته از عمق تاریخ، نشریه مقام، 5، 18-25.
شه‌بخش، ع. (1373). پژوهشی در تاریخ معاصر بلوچستان. شیراز: نوید شیراز.
معیدفر، س و شهلی‌بر، ع. (1386). جهانی‌شدن و شکل‌گیری سیاست فرهنگی محلی: مصرف رسانه‌ای بلوچ‌های ایران و چالش‌های هویت قومی و هویت محلی. مجله دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه خوارزمی، 15 (57-56): 183‑‏208.
ملکی، س، ملکی، س، و بختیاری ف. (1404). جنبه‌های استعاری، مجازی و تعاملی مفهوم‌سازی ترس: نگاهی شناختی. زبانشناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، (2) 17، 1-27.
doi: 10.22067/jlkd.2025.92178.1306
همتی، ت و پهلوان نژاد، م. ر. (1404). استعاره‌های مفهومی هوش مصنوعی در رسانه‌های خبری فارسی‌زبان: تحلیل بافتی‑شناختی بر اساس نظریۀ گسترش‌یافتۀ استعارۀ مفهومی. زبانشناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، 17 (3)، 45-73.
doi: 10.22067/jlkd.2025.94768.1342
Baron, S., Everett, B. C., Latham, A. J., Miller, K., Tierney, H., Thang, J. V. (2023). Moving ego versus moving time: investigating the shared source of future-bias and near-bias. Synthese, 202, Article number 94.
Bender, A., Beller, S., & Bennardo, G. (2010). Temporal frames of reference: Conceptual analysis and empirical evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese, and Tongan. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 283–307.
Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1-28.
Boroditsky, L. and M. Ramscar. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185-188.
Callizo-Romero, C., Tutnjević, S., Pandza, M., Ouellet, M., Kranjec, A., Ilić, S., ... & Santiago, J. (2020). Temporal focus and time spatialization across cultures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(6), 1247-1258.
Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied psychological measurement, 12(4), 425-434.
Doob, L. W. 1971. Patterning of time, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Evans, V. (2004). The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning, and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans, V. (2013). Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge University Press.
Feist, M & Duffy SE. (2023). To each their own: a review of individual differences and metaphorical perspectives on time. Front. Psychol. 14:1213719. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213719
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Jahani, C. and A. Korn, (2009). Balochi. In: G. Winfuhr, (Ed.), The Iranian Languages (pp. 634-692). London, New York: Routledge.
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Lai, V., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). The immediate and chronic influence of spatio-temporal metaphors on the mental representations of time in English, Mandarin, and Mandarin-English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 142.
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00142
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Li, H., & Cao, Y. (2022). Time for politics: The relationship between political attitude and implicit space-time mappings. Current Psychology, 41(3), 118.
Margolies, S. and L. Crawford. 2008. Event valance and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition and Emotion, 22(7), 1401-1414.
McGlone, M. and J. Harding. 1998. Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1211-1223.
Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive science, 30(3), 401-450.
Piata, A., Soriano, C. (2022). The affect bias in the metaphorical representation of anticipated events. Metaphor and the Social World. 12(1). 115-137.
Reali, F., & Lleras, M. (2017). Perspectives in motion: the case of metaphorical temporal statements in Spanish. Language and Cognition, 9(1), 172-190.
Rothe-Wulf, A., Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2015). Temporal frames of reference in three Germanic languages: Individual consistency, interindividual consensus, and cross-linguistic variability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(5), 917-939.
Stanojević, M. M., Tonković, M., Peti-Stantić, A. (2023). “When do Metaphorical Frames Exhibit Psycholinguistic Effects? The Case of the Ego-Moving and Time-Moving Metaphor in Climate Change”. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature. 47(2). 97-107.
Stickles, E., & Lewis, T. N. (2018). Wednesday's Meeting Really Is on Friday: A Meta‐Analysis and Evaluation of Ambiguous Spatiotemporal Language. Cognitive science, 42(3), 1015-1025. ‏
West, P. 1989. Cross-cultural literacy and the pacific rim, Business horizons, 32, 2: 3-13.
Xu, X., Jia, M., Chen, R. (2024). Time moving or ego moving? How time metaphors influence perceived temporal distance. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(3). 466-480.
Yu, N. (2012). The metaphorical orientation of time in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1335-1354. ‏
Yu, N. (2023). Metaphors from perception and culture: The case of solidity. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 398-421.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.