1- ابوالقاسمی، محسن (1389). تاریخ زبان فارسی، تهران: سمت.
2- ارداویرافنامه (1382). فیلیپ ژینیو، ترجمه ژاله آموزگار، تهران: معین و انجمن ایرانشناسی فرانسه.
3- رضائی باغ بیدی، حسن (1388). تاریخ زبانهای ایرانی. مرکز دایرهالمعارف بزرگ اسلامی: تهران.
4- ساداتی نوشآبادی، سید مهدی؛ صبوری، نرجس بانو (1397). بررسی حرکت نحوی پرسشواژهها در فارسی میانه زردشتی بر اساس «اصل نگارش بند» (پژوهشی بر پایه دستور زایشی). جستارهای زبانی. ۱۳۹۷; ۹ (۶) :۶۹-۹۱.
5- ساداتی نوشآبادی، سید مهدی؛ صبوری، نرجس بانو (الف1398). بررسی پدیده حرکت سازههای جمله بر اساس «نظریه کپی حرکت» و «اصل خطی شدگی» در زبانهای فارسی باستان و فارسی میانه (پژوهشی بر پایه دستور زایشی). جستارهای زبانی .1398؛ 10 (2): 147-170.
6- مینوی خرد (1379). ترجمه احمد تفضلی، تهران: توس.
7- وزیدگیهای زادسپرم (1385). ترجمه و تحقیق محمدتقی راشد محصل، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
8- Adger, David. (2003).Core Syntax, A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press
9- An, Duk-Ho. (2007(. Syntax at the PF interface: Prosodic mapping, linear order, and deletion. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs
10- Bosˇkovic’, Zˇ. (1994). "D-structure, theta criterion, and movement into theta positions," Linguistic Analysis 24, 247–86.
11- Bresnan, J. (1977)."Variables in the Theory of Transformations," in Culicover, P. W., Wasow and A. Akmajian, eds., Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, 157-196.
12- Browning, M. A. (1987). Null operator constructions, Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Cambridge: USA.
13- Chomsky, Noam. (1982).Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.
14- Chomsky, Noam. (1986b). Barriers. MIT Press: Massachusetts
15- Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
16- Chomsky, Noam (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17- Chomsky, Noam (2001). Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.
18- Cinque, G. (1990). Types of A'-Dependencies (PhD thesis). MIT. Cambridge: USA.
19- Citko, Barbara (2005). On the Nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge. Linguistic Inquiry, Volume 36, Number 4, Fall 2005, 475-496.
20- Citko, Barbara (2011b). Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move, and Labels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21- Culicover, Peter W. (2001). Parasitic gaps: A history. In Parasitic Gaps, eds. P. Culicover and P. Postal, 3-68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22- Enç, Murvet (1991).The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22 (1): 1-25.
23- Engdahl, Elisabet (1983). Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6: 5-34
24- Epstein, Samuel; M.Groat, Erich; Kawashima, Ruriko; and Kitahara, Hisatsugu (1998). A derivational approach to syntactic relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
25- Gartner, Hans-Martin (1999). Phrase linking meets minimalist syntax. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed.by Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason D.Haugen, and Peter Norquest, 159–169.Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.
26- Grosz, Patrick (2009). Movement and agreement in right-node raising constructions (unpublished manuscript) MIT. Cambridge: USA.
27- Hageman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
28- Hageman, L. (2006). Thinking Syntactically. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher
29- Haık, Isabelle (1985). The syntax of operators (PhD Thesis). MIT. Cambridge: USA.
30- Hiraiwa, Ken (2005). Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: agreement and clausal architecture (PhD Thesis). MIT. Cambridge: USA.
31- Hornstein, N. (2001). Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
32- Hornstein, N., J. Nunes, and K. K. Grohmann (2005). Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
33- Karimi, Simin. (1999b). A note on parasitic gaps and specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 30 (4): 704-713.
34- Karimi, Simin. (2005). A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Mouton De Gruyter.
35- Kayne, R. (1983). Connectedness. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 223-249.
36- Kayne, R. (1994). The anti-symmetry of syntax. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Twenty-Five. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37- Lasnik, Howard. (1995). Last Resort and Attract F. In Papers from the 6th Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid- America, vol. 1, ed. by Leslie Gabriele, Debra Hardison, and Robert Westmoreland, 62–81. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
38- Munn, Alan. (1993). Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures (PhD thesis). University of Maryland, College Park.
39- Niinuma, Fumikazu (2010). Across-the-Board and Parasitic Gap Constructions in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 41, 161-169
40- Nissenbaum, Jonathan. (2000). Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement (PhD thesis). MIT. Cambridge: USA.
41- Nunes, Jairo (1995). The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the minimalist program (PhD thesis). University of Maryland, College Park.
42- Nunes, Jairo (2004). Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43- Nunes, Jairo; C. Zocca. (2005). "Morphological identity in ellipsis," Leiden Papers in Linguistics, 2.2, 29–42.
44- Pesetsky, David (1982). Paths and categories (PhD thesis). MIT. Cambridge: USA.
45- Postal, Paul (1993). Parasitic gaps and the across-the-board phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry, 24:735–754.
46- Ross, J. R. (1967).Constraints on Variables in Syntax (PhD thesis). MIT. Cambridge: USA.
47- Starke, Michal (2001). Move dissolves into Merge: A theory of locality (PhD thesis). University of Geneva.
48- Taraldsen, T. (1981). “The Theoretical Implications of a Class of Marked Extraction”. In Belleti et al. eds. Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.
49- Williams, Edwin (1990). The ATB theory of parasitic gaps. The Linguistic Review, 6:265–279.
50- Zhang, Niina (2004). Move is Remerge. Language and Linguistics, 5 (1).189-209.
Send comment about this article