The Syntactic Analysis of the Structure of Compound Verbs in Persian based on The Theory of Distributed Morphology

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Ahoo Alvand ¹
• Zeinab Mohammad Ebrahimi Jahromi ²

¹ PhD student in Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

² Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, School of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jlkd.2022.72364.1054

Abstract

Compound verbs are one of the most frequent types of verbs in Persian and have been the subject of many researches. This type of verb is actually a compound predicate that consists of a verbal component and one (or more) non-verbal component that, together, express a meaning. In this article, we provide a model for the structure of compound verbs in Persian based on the theory of Distributed Morphology. It becomes clear that in the structure of compound verbs, an abstract root is considered for each component. These roots have no syntactic category and phonetic essence and are only a chain of semantic features. At first, roots merge in their base position according to Minimalism Program and pass the known syntactic processes in the theory. After that, they undergo post-syntactic processes on the basis of Distributed Morphology. Finally, the syntactic nodes are prepared for the insertion of Vocabulary Items (VI). It is shown that the root related to the non-verbal component is merged in the head of the predicate group (PredP) and bears the main burden of predication in the sentence. This group is in sister position to the vP. The verbal component of the compound verb is merged into the head of vP.

Keywords

• Distributed Morphology
• compound verbs
• abstract root
• fusion
• late insertion

Main Subjects

• Syntax

References

الوند، آهو؛ «بررسی محمول­های مرکب پیامدی در زبان فارسی، رویکردی کمینه­گرا»؛ پایان­نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران: شهریور 1394.

انوشه، مزدک؛ «فرافکن‌های نمود و زمان در صفت‌های فاعلی مرکب: بر پایۀ نظریۀ صرف توزیعی»؛ جستارهای زبانی، دفتر 6، شماره 5 (26)، آذر و دی 1394، صص 49-72.

ـــــــــ؛ «جایگاه فرافکن نفی و مجوزدهی به هیچ واژه‌ها در فارسی بر پایۀ نظریۀ صرف توزیعی»؛ پژوهش­های زبانی، سال 8، شمارۀ 1، بهار و تابستان 1396.

______؛ صرف در نحو از کمینه‌گرایی تا صرف توزیعی، تهران: موسسۀ انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 1399.

انوشه، مزدک و گوهر شریفی؛ «گروه فعلی شکافته در فارسی: تمایز هستۀ جهت و فعل کوچک»، مطالعات زبان‌ها گویش‌های غرب ایران، 7(24)، 1398، صص 33-48.

Bobaljik, J. D.; Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words; Under contract: MIT Press. 2011.

Chomsky, N. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1995.

Embick, D. & R. Noyer; “Movement Operations after Syntax”; Linguistic Inquiry, 32 (4), 2001, 555–595.

Folli, R., Harley, H. and Karimi S.; "Determinants of the event type in Persian Complex predicates"; In: Astruc, L. and M. Richards (eds.) Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 2005.

Hale, K and Keyser, S. J. "On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations". In: K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (Eds) The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvian Bromberger (53-109), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1993.

Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec; “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection”; In: “The View from Building” 20, ed. Kenneth Hale and S. Jay Keyser. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993, 111–176.

___________; “Some key features of Distributed Morphology”; In: A. Carnie & H. Harley (Eds), “Papers on Phonology and Morphology” (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21), 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, 1994.

Harley, H. “External Arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the Distinctness of Voice and v”, lingua, 2013, 125, 34-57.

___________; “The Bundling Hypothesis and the Disparate Functions of Little v”. In: R. D. Alessandro, I. Franco & A. J. Gallego (Eds.), The Verbal Domain, (pp. 3-28) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

Karimi, Simin; “Persian Complex Verbs: Idiomatic or Compositional"; Lexicology, 1997, 3: 273‐318.

___________; A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian; The Hague: Motoun, 2005.

Larson, R.K. “On the Double Object Construction”, Linguistic Inquiry, 1988, 19: 335-391.

Marantz, A. “No Escape from Syntax; Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon”. In: A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark, and A. Williams (Eds). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers (201-205). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1997.  

Pylkkänen, L., Introducing Arguments, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.

____________ (2008). Introducing Arguments. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Nevins, Andrew; “Lectures on Postsyntactic Morphology”; in lingbuzz/002587, 2016.

Siddiqi, Daniel; Syntax within the Word. Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology; John Benjamin B.V, 2009