Syntax
Shabnam Majidi; Fatemeh Bahrami; Mazdak Anoushe
Volume 16, Issue 1 , August 2024, , Pages 151-185
Abstract
Ellipsis phenomena or deletions, in traditional generative terms, involve a number of cases where otherwise expected syntactic material goes missing under some conditions. How to formulate a generalization that can explain all types of deletion has been a central question since the dawn of Principle ...
Read More
Ellipsis phenomena or deletions, in traditional generative terms, involve a number of cases where otherwise expected syntactic material goes missing under some conditions. How to formulate a generalization that can explain all types of deletion has been a central question since the dawn of Principle and Parameters Theory. The present study endeavored to take a step towards this goal within the framework of phase-based minimalist syntax in order to provide a comprehensive explanation of various types of ellipsis in Persian clauses. To achieve this, at first, the main issues of ellipsis were outlined and the success of the different accounts available in the literature were evaluated. Then, the split-C system was introduced and the functional projections dominating the Tense Phrase were examined in order to identify the projection that forms the upper phase in Persian. The empirical evidence shows that, similar to German, the typical complementizers like “ke” (that) and “ta” (in order to) are generated in the head of Finite Phrase (FinP) in Persian and then raises to the head of the Force Phrase (ForceP), thus, the FinP should be considered the upper phase, which triggers some deletion processes in the clause structure. Following this proposal, it was tried to provide a detailed description of the types of deletion within the clause and attempted to analyze the deleted structures such as gapping, pseudogapping, Right Node Raising, VP-ellipsis, sluicing, tag-question, and sentence fragmentation based on the minimalist approach. Ultimately, in the final section of the research, it was argue that the different types of deletion within the clause apply to the lower phase (vP) or upper phase (FinP) and eliminate the heads and/or constituents from the syntactic derivation. This analysis, relying on the post-syntactic operations of deletion and morphological merger, explains why in complex predicates, the non-verbal element can be either retained or deleted.
Mohammad Amuzadeh Mahdiraji; Fatemeh Bahrami
Volume 2, Issue 2 , October 2010
Abstract
Deicticity in language is an important issue that can be analyzed pragmatically. So the present paper aims to investigate the pragmatic aspects of time deictic terms in Persian and the way they are used by Farsi speakers. Much information which is transferred in speech has pragmatic aspects and relates ...
Read More
Deicticity in language is an important issue that can be analyzed pragmatically. So the present paper aims to investigate the pragmatic aspects of time deictic terms in Persian and the way they are used by Farsi speakers. Much information which is transferred in speech has pragmatic aspects and relates to the certain context of situation and social context. One of the goals of this paper is to reveal the role of time deixis in transferring pragmatic concepts in context of situation that grammar is unable to explain exhaustively
