Linguistic typology
Vali Rezai; Mahdeih Abbaspour
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 25 September 2024
Abstract
This study employs a typological approach to examine the terminology used for lower body parts in Persian and English. The aim is to identify commonalities and divergences in the naming and categorization of human body parts, while also assessing the validity of proposed linguistic universals in this ...
Read More
This study employs a typological approach to examine the terminology used for lower body parts in Persian and English. The aim is to identify commonalities and divergences in the naming and categorization of human body parts, while also assessing the validity of proposed linguistic universals in this field. Despite linguistic and cultural differences, the findings reveal significant similarities in the general classification of lower limbs between the two languages , with six main categories identified in both. However, variations exist in the specific terminology and categorization details, suggesting the influence of cultural and worldview differences on bodily conceptualization. Further, an examination of language universals indicates that while some hold true across both languages, others are not fully supported. This research underscores that even with shared underlying concepts, languages can exhibit distinct semantic systems in their representation of the human body.Keywords: Lexical typology, lexical field, The names of body parts, language universals.